Overshoot and Ringing in Tube Amplifiers--Causes, Detection (Square-Wave Test), and Practical Adjustment Methods

Published by IWISTAO

---

Introduction

In tube amplifiers, overshoot and ringing are common distortion or instability phenomena.

They are typically caused by excessive feedback gain or deficiencies in output transformer design. These issues can be effectively addressed through precise adjustments focusing on optimizing the feedback loop, gain structure, and output transformer behavior.

The sections below provide a detailed, practical guide for diagnosing and resolving overshoot and ringing during tube-amplifier debugging, using a square-wave test and oscilloscope observation.

Test Method (Recommended):

Apply a square-wave signal (for example, 1 kHz) to the amplifier input and observe the output waveform on an oscilloscope across a proper dummy load.

1. Overshoot Adjustment

1.1 Identifying Overshoot

Apply a square-wave signal (for example, 1 kHz) and observe the output waveform on an oscilloscope:

• Overshoot appears as a sharp “spike” or peak at the top of the waveform, where the signal exceeds the ideal flat level.
• Overshoot usually occurs during the high-level portion of the waveform, indicating that the amplifier gain is too high or that the feedback loop is responding too aggressively.

1.2 Cause Analysis

• Excessive feedback gain: When feedback gain is too high, the amplifier overreacts to rapid signal changes, causing transient over-amplification and overshoot at the waveform edges.
• Driver stage issues: If the gain of the driver or preamplifier stage is too high, the power stage may be overdriven, especially when the input signal amplitude is excessive.
• Power supply instability: Poor power-supply regulation or inadequate filtering can introduce voltage lag or fluctuations, which can exacerbate overshoot behavior.

1.3 Adjustment Procedure

1. Reduce feedback gain: Inspect the feedback loop and reduce the amount of feedback if necessary. Lower feedback gain slows the amplifier’s transient response and often eliminates overshoot.
   • Global negative feedback: slightly reducing the feedback ratio is often effective.
   • Local feedback: ensure that resistor and capacitor values are correctly chosen to avoid excessive high-frequency gain.
2. Optimize driver-stage gain: If overshoot originates from excessive driver gain, adjust the driver stage to reduce signal amplitude and prevent the output stage from being pushed beyond its linear region.
3. Check power-supply stability: Verify that the B+ supply remains stable under load. Improving filtering—such as increasing reservoir capacitance within safe limits—can help reduce overshoot.
4. Add or adjust feedback resistors: Introducing small resistors in the feedback path (typically in the 1 kΩ to 10 kΩ range, depending on design) can help smooth the feedback response and suppress overshoot.

---

2. Ringing Adjustment

2.1 Identifying Ringing

Ringing is typically visible at the rising and falling edges of a square-wave signal:

• Ringing appears as oscillations or “echoes” following the waveform transitions.
• Instead of a clean, instantaneous edge, the waveform shows several cycles of damped oscillation.

2.2 Cause Analysis

• Output transformer design limitations: If the output transformer lacks sufficient bandwidth or approaches magnetic saturation, frequency response becomes uneven, leading to ringing during fast signal transitions.
• Compensation network issues: Tube amplifiers often include compensation networks to stabilize high-frequency response. Incorrect capacitor values or time constants can result in excessive high-frequency resonance, producing ringing.
• Poor circuit layout: Suboptimal wiring, grounding, or lead dress can introduce parasitic capacitance and inductance, contributing to high-frequency instability and ringing.

2.3 Adjustment Procedure

1. Evaluate the output transformer: If ringing is prominent at waveform edges, examine whether the output transformer provides adequate bandwidth.
   • Use a high-quality transformer with appropriate low- and high-frequency performance.
   • Ensure the core does not saturate under normal operating conditions.
2. Adjust compensation networks: If ringing originates from compensation circuits, experiment with compensation capacitor values and time constants.
   • Reducing compensation capacitance or adjusting associated resistors can rebalance high-frequency response and suppress oscillations.
3. Improve circuit layout: Keep signal paths short and direct to minimize parasitic effects.
   • Use low-impedance grounding techniques.
   • Avoid ground loops and maintain proper separation between signal and power paths.
4. Add high-frequency damping: Small high-frequency suppression capacitors (for example, 100 pF to 1 nF, depending on design) at appropriate locations can help smooth high-frequency components and reduce ringing.

---

3. Summary

• Overshoot is mainly caused by excessive feedback gain, overly high driver-stage gain, or unstable power supplies. It can be mitigated by reducing feedback, optimizing gain structure, and improving power-supply stability.
• Ringing is typically caused by output transformer limitations or improper compensation. It can be reduced by selecting suitable transformers, adjusting compensation networks, and improving circuit layout.
• Through careful adjustment of the feedback loop, gain structure, and output transformer design, overshoot and ringing in tube amplifiers can be significantly reduced, resulting in cleaner, more stable, and more accurate sound reproduction.

Practical Tip:

Always verify square-wave results at multiple frequencies (e.g., 100 Hz / 1 kHz / 10 kHz) and with the correct rated load. Many overshoot and ringing issues only become obvious at the high-frequency edge transitions.

Radio and the Emergence of a Synchronized World

Published by IWISTAO

Prior to the development of radio, human societies did not share a unified temporal experience. Information circulated through letters, newspapers, and telegraph networks, each constrained by physical transmission and institutional mediation. Even events of major historical significance often reached different populations at different times. As a result, social reality unfolded asynchronously: individuals and communities inhabited distinct temporal frameworks, shaped by geography and the speed of information flow.

In such a context, the notion of a universal present—of a shared “now”—had limited applicability. Time, as experienced socially, was fragmented and local rather than collective.

Scientific Foundations of Wireless Communication

The scientific conditions that enabled radio communication emerged in the late nineteenth century through advances in electromagnetic theory. James Clerk Maxwell demonstrated mathematically that electromagnetic waves could propagate through space, while Heinrich Hertz later confirmed these predictions experimentally. Although these developments were not conceived with mass communication in mind, they established the theoretical possibility of transmitting signals independently of physical conduits.

This possibility was translated into practical technology by the Italian engineer Guglielmo Marconi, whose experiments in the 1890s and early twentieth century culminated in long-distance and transoceanic wireless transmission. With these achievements, information was no longer bound to fixed infrastructures such as cables or printing networks. Communication could occur across space with unprecedented immediacy.

From Communication to Broadcasting

Initially, radio functioned as a point-to-point communication system. Its primary applications were maritime coordination, military operations, and emergency signaling. In these contexts, radio’s value derived from reliability and reach rather than from content or audience scale. It was a technical instrument designed to ensure that messages could be received under conditions where other systems failed.

The transformation of radio into a mass medium occurred in the early twentieth century with the emergence of broadcasting. Beginning around 1920, scheduled radio programs appeared in the United States and Europe. Unlike earlier forms of communication, broadcasting addressed an indeterminate audience simultaneously. Sound was no longer directed toward a specific receiver but dispersed across space to all who possessed the means to listen.

Simultaneity and the Shared Present

This shift marked a fundamental change in the temporal structure of communication.

Broadcasting introduced simultaneity as a defining feature of mass experience. Music, news, and speech were no longer encountered sequentially or retrospectively; they were received in real time by large populations. Individuals who remained socially anonymous to one another nevertheless occupied the same temporal moment. The experience of listening became, implicitly, a collective act.

In this sense, radio produced what may be described as a shared present: a temporally synchronized field of experience extending beyond local or interpersonal boundaries. This development had far-reaching social and political implications.

Political, Social, and Wartime Implications

Political communication acquired new immediacy. Leaders could address populations directly through voice, circumventing the interpretive filters of print journalism. Tone, rhythm, and presence became central elements of persuasion. Public opinion was shaped not only by argument, but by affective transmission mediated through sound.

During periods of war, radio’s capacity for synchronization assumed heightened significance. News bulletins, official announcements, and propaganda broadcasts aligned civilian perception with unfolding military events. The temporal gap between front lines and domestic spaces was narrowed, producing a sense of shared urgency and participation despite physical separation.

Radio and the Reorganization of Daily Time

Beyond politics, radio also reorganized everyday temporal practices. Broadcast schedules imposed standardized time markers on domestic life. News programs, music segments, and evening broadcasts structured daily routines, embedding institutional time within private space. Time itself became, in part, a function of programming.

Unlike later visual media, radio did not monopolize attention. Its auditory nature allowed it to coexist with other activities. Listening could accompany work, conversation, or rest. Information thus entered daily life as a continuous background presence rather than as a discrete event demanding full cognitive focus.

This characteristic contributed to radio’s pervasive influence. It did not merely inform; it habituated listeners to a mode of constant connection with distant events.

Retro Wooden HIFI Radio AM/FM 2x5W Desktop Speakers Rotary Tuning Bluetooth U Disk Playing

Retro Wooden HIFI Radio AM/FM 2x5W Desktop Speakers Support Bluetooth U Disk SD Card Playing High Sensitivity

Legacy of a Synchronized World

Although radio’s centrality declined with the rise of television and digital media, the temporal model it established persisted. Real-time reporting, live broadcasts, and the expectation of immediate access to events are direct continuations of the broadcasting logic introduced by radio.

From a historical perspective, radio did not fundamentally alter the nature of content. Its significance lies in the transformation of temporal experience. By enabling simultaneous reception on a mass scale, radio reconfigured how societies perceive events, relate to one another, and situate themselves within time.

The world ceased to occur as a series of isolated moments
and began to unfold as a shared temporal reality.

This reorganization of time, rather than any particular program or technology, constitutes radio’s enduring contribution to modern civilization.